APLN Policy Brief 24

The following is a summary. Click on the adjacent link to download the full brief.

The current and oft repeated pattern of responses to North Korean nuclear and missile provocations has failed to produce results. With the stakes becoming increasingly high it is time that a new approach is explored. The success to date of the deal to cap Iran’s nuclear program offers clues to a different approach with North Korea. North Korea’s position now is stronger than ever before – it has more bargaining chips. Conversely, the threats posed by North Korea have never been greater. A negotiated settlement is the only acceptable outcome. The key will be to have a broad enough agenda for negotiations to ensure all parties see benefit: addressing the nuclear and missile issues, economic issues (removal of sanctions) and security issues (a Korean peace treaty to replace the armistice). The alternatives to negotiations are war or another nuclear weapon state with a de facto nuclear deterrent capability. Neither prospect will make any nation in the region more secure.

About the Author

Sverre Lodgaard is a Senior Research Fellow at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI).

Leon V. Sigal is the Director of the Northeast Asia Cooperative Security Project at the Social Science Research Council (SSRC) in New York.

Image: Wikimedia Commons.